Tuesday, 10 November 2015

A Rebuke to India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi

A Rebuke to India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi
By THE EDITORIAL BOARDNOV. 9, 2015  117 COMMENTS
Photo

Nitish Kumar, chief minister of Bihar, greeted supporters after victory in state elections on Sunday. Credit Aftab Alam Siddiqui/Associated Press
Advertisement


During a national election in India last year, Narendra Modi promised “development for all.” As prime minister, he has yet to deliver big economic improvements, but in the meantime, members of his government and political party have shredded his promise of inclusion by inflaming sectarian tensions. Now, voters in the country’s third most populous state have sent Mr. Modi a message: Put an end to the hatemongering.

Poisoning politics with religious hatred is bound to squander the country’s economic potential at a time when India should be playing a bigger and more constructive role in South Asia and the world. India’s history is filled with examples of religious and caste-based violence that set the country back. Those conflicts subsided during India’s rapid economic growth, but many Indians now fear a resurgence.

On Sunday, Mr. Modi and his Bharatiya Janata Party lost a legislative election in the northern state of Bihar, which has a population of more than 100 million. A “grand alliance” of secular parties united by their antipathy to the Hindu nationalist B.J.P. won 178 constituencies in the 243-member legislative assembly to the B.J.P.’s 53. Many political analysts see the loss as a repudiation of Mr. Modi because he and his top aides campaigned vigorously in the state and many ads carried his image, rather than photos of local politicians.

Continue reading the main story
Sign Up for the Opinion Today Newsletter
Every weekday, get thought-provoking commentary from Op-Ed columnists, The Times editorial board and contributing writers from around the world.


In the months leading up to the Bihar election, hard-liners in the B.J.P. and organizations affiliated with the party stoked India’s long-simmering sectarian tensions. The party’s lawmakers pushed for beef bans around the country ostensibly to protect the cow, which many Hindus consider holy, but really as a ploy to divide Hindus and Muslims, some of whom eat beef.

Mobs riled by the anti-beef crusade have killed four Muslims suspected of slaughtering, stealing or smuggling cows in the last seven weeks. And in August, unidentified attackers shot and killed Malleshappa Madivalappa Kalburgi, a scholar and vocal critic of Hindu idolatry. Hundreds of writers, filmmakers and academics have protested the growing intolerance by returning awards they received from the government-supported bodies.

Mr. Modi has not forcefully condemned the beef-related killings, despite pleas by Muslims and other minorities. He has tolerated hateful and insensitive remarks by his ministers and by B.J.P. officials.

Continue reading the main story
RECENT COMMENTS

rameshraghuvanshi 13 minutes ago
Indian politics not so easy to judge in boardroom of NY times office.Ground reality is quite different.Modi was defeated and Nitish wined...
Al 30 minutes ago
This is classic "lazy journalism". The only reason the opposition won is because they were united. Nitish Kumar, Lalu Prasad and the...
iyer 30 minutes ago
A very apt and perceptive comment from a newspaper thousands of miles and cultures away from India's Bihar... humanity is the key to...
SEE ALL COMMENTS  WRITE A COMMENT
During a campaign stop in Bihar, Mr. Modi tried to exploit sectarian divisions by telling voters that the secular alliance would reduce affirmative action benefits for lower-caste Hindus and tribes in favor of “a particular community” — an apparent reference to Muslims. And the president of the B.J.P., Amit Shah, one of Mr. Modi’s closest advisers, told voters that a victory for the alliance would be celebrated in Pakistan, the Muslim-majority neighbor that has fought several wars with India since 1947.

CONTINUE READING THE MAIN STORY
117
COMMENTS
Voters in Bihar saw through the B.J.P.’s attempts to divide them. They, like most Indians, are looking for leaders who will improve their standard of living. Bihar is one of the poorest states in India but has grown fast in the last 10 years under the leadership of Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, who is credited for cracking down on crime, building roads and increasing the enrollment of girls in schools.

Mr. Modi and the B.J.P. secured a majority in the lower house of Parliament last year with promises of economic reforms. Now, to push through those reforms, the party needs to win the control of the upper house, which is elected by state assemblies. It won’t win those elections unless Mr. Modi gets rid of the officials in his government and party who are fueling sectarian culture wars.

Meanwhile, there are things Mr. Modi could do administratively to improve the economy, like investing in education and health care and building infrastructure. Voters in Bihar have sent the B.J.P. a clear message. Mr. Modi should heed it.


New York Times editorial slams Modi, says 'end hatemongering' is Bihar's message to PM
Nov 10, 2015 13:18 IST
#BeefBan   #bIhar   #Bihar Assembly Election 2015   #BJP   #Grand Alliance   #Modi   #Narendra Modi   #New York Times   #NewsTracker  
8 Comments

197850
Washington, DC: Bihar's electorate has sent Prime Minister Narendra Modi a message: "Put an end to hatemongering", said The New York Times on Tuesday.
An editorial titled A rebuke to India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi in The New York Times said that during a national election in India last year, Modi promised “development for all”.
Narendra Modi in a file photo. Naresh Sharma/Firstpost Narendra Modi in a file photo. Naresh Sharma/Firstpost
As prime minister, he has yet to deliver big economic improvements, "but in the meantime, members of his government and political party have shredded his promise of inclusion by inflaming sectarian tensions".
"Now, voters in the country’s third most populous state have sent Modi a message: Put an end to the hatemongering," said the daily.
The editorial said that "poisoning politics with religious hatred is bound to squander the country’s economic potential at a time when India should be playing a bigger and more constructive role in South Asia and the world".
"India’s history is filled with examples of religious and caste-based violence that set the country back. Those conflicts subsided during India’s rapid economic growth, but many Indians now fear a resurgence."
On Sunday, Modi and his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lost a legislative election in Bihar. A grand alliance of secular parties "united by their antipathy to the Hindu nationalist BJP" won 178 constituencies in the 243-member legislative assembly to the BJP’s 53.
The daily said that many political analysts see the loss as a "repudiation of Modi" because he and his top aides campaigned vigorously in the state and many ads carried his image, rather than photos of local politicians.
In the months leading up to the Bihar election, hardliners in the BJP and organizations affiliated with the party stoked India’s long-simmering sectarian tensions.
"The party’s lawmakers pushed for beef bans around the country ostensibly to protect the cow, which many Hindus consider holy, but really as a ploy to divide Hindus and Muslims, some of whom eat beef."
Mobs riled by the anti-beef crusade have killed four Muslims suspected of slaughtering, stealing or smuggling cows in the last seven weeks. And in August, unidentified attackers shot and killed Malleshappa Madivalappa Kalburgi, a scholar and vocal critic of Hindu idolatry. Hundreds of writers, filmmakers and academics have protested the growing intolerance by returning awards they received from the government-supported bodies.
NYT went on to say that Modi has "not forcefully condemned the beef-related killings, despite pleas by Muslims and other minorities. He has tolerated hateful and insensitive remarks by his ministers and by BJP officials".
During a campaign stop in Bihar, Modi "tried to exploit sectarian divisions by telling voters that the secular alliance would reduce affirmative action benefits for lower-caste Hindus and tribes in favour of 'a particular community' - an apparent reference to Muslims".
And BJP president Amit Shah, one of Modi’s closest advisers, told voters that a victory for the alliance would be celebrated in Pakistan, the Muslim-majority neighbour that has fought several wars with India since 1947.
"Voters in Bihar saw through the BJP’s attempts to divide them. They, like most Indians, are looking for leaders who will improve their standard of living. Bihar is one of the poorest states in India but has grown fast in the last 10 years under the leadership of Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, who is credited for cracking down on crime, building roads and increasing the enrollment of girls in schools."
The editorial said that Modi and the BJP secured a majority in the lower house of Parliament last year with promises of economic reforms.
"Now, to push through those reforms, the party needs to win the control of the upper house, which is elected by state assemblies. It won’t win those elections unless Modi gets rid of the officials in his government and party who are fueling sectarian culture wars," it added.
The daily noted that there are things Modi could do administratively to improve the economy, like investing in education and health care and building infrastructure. "Voters in Bihar have sent the BJP a clear message. Modi should heed it."
IANS

No comments:

Post a Comment