Tuesday 29 June 2021

Sikhs abused for highlighting abduction and religious conversion to Islam in Kashmir, fractures appear in ‘Sikh-Muslim unity’ project

 Sikhs abused for highlighting abduction and religious conversion to Islam in Kashmir, fractures appear in ‘Sikh-Muslim unity’ project

The 'Sikh-Muslim unity' project at least has not reached such disastrous proportions yet, or so it seems. Manjinder Singh Sirsa, who had called Hinduism 'weak' after Yogi Adityanath in Uttar Pradesh passed an anti-conversion law, now wants the same in Jammu & Kashmir.


27 June, 2021

K Bhattacharjee

Sikhs trolled for highlighting abduction and religious conversion to Islam in Kashmir, fractures appear in 'Sikh-Muslim unity' project

Image Credit: Indian Express

1126


 

Tensions are rife in Kashmir after two Sikh girls were allegedly kidnapped and converted to Islam recently. According to the claims of the Sikh community, at least one of them has been located and is mentally unstable. The girl was produced before the Court and her statement was allegedly recorded in absence of her family. The Court gave the verdict in favour of the man and she was allowed to go with his family.


The news was shared on Twitter by Amaan who is now being trolled on social media for highlighting the issue. One person said that Sikhs were behaving worse than ‘Sanghis’ after one incident.


One incident and these scums started behaving worse than sanghis. https://t.co/GMTldhdiNo


— Ishfaq Nabi (@Ishfaq_Nabi_Dar) June 27, 2021

The same individual highlighted a crass comment by an apparently Sikh man to assert that no one is an ally for the Muslim community.


Muslims attending to support this shit incident? One isolated incident whose truth is yet to come out and you guys are showing your true colours. Dear, Muslims no one is your ally https://t.co/aviszECxqV pic.twitter.com/b0rFp5cNSh


— Ishfaq Nabi (@Ishfaq_Nabi_Dar) June 27, 2021

Another user accused Amaan of “spreading hate” against the Kashmiri Muslim community while using abusive words for the Kashmiri Pandit community.




 

The sentiment appears to be widespread among the Kashmiri Muslim community.


A single case is being projected as such that as if it is happening every day .some days back a muslim girl frm Kashmir was taken in similar fashion in Punjab and her parents were arrested when they tried to contact her , so shall we blame whole community for that ??? https://t.co/FALrtQ8PtM


— syed fazil (@fazilsyed299) June 27, 2021

Meanwhile, Amaan is urging Sikh youths to not ‘cross over to the saffron side’. He appears equally concerned about the ‘Sanghi ecosystem’ taking advantage of the incident as he is for the fate of the girls themselves.



In recent times, there has been a concerted effort to stitch together a fictitious ‘Sikh-Muslim’ political unity. Towards that end, langars were organised for the Shaheen Bagh protesters in Delhi and subsequently, the farmer protests, with its distinct Khalistani undertones, have received significant support from Islamists as well.


However, that initiative appears to be going down the same route as ‘Dalit-Muslim’ unity. For the sake of such a unity, Dalit leaders often maintain a strategic silence committed by Islamists against people from the Dalit community. It has happened on several occasions that prominent Dalit leaders remained silent while Dalits continued to suffer the brunt of the Islamist attacks.



 

The ‘Sikh-Muslim unity’ project at least has not reached such disastrous proportions yet, or so it seems. Manjinder Singh Sirsa, who had called Hinduism ‘weak’ after Yogi Adityanath in Uttar Pradesh passed an anti-conversion law, now wants the same in Jammu & Kashmir.


Sirsa also lamented the fact that the Sikh community had supported the Muslim community during the protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act but no Muslim leader has come forward to support his community now.


Such developments once again proves that the ‘Sikh-Muslim unity’ project is based on a mountain of lies being crafted solely for the benefit of political leaders for their personal ambitions. Before long, if it suits their purpose, they will definitely be more than willing to throw Sikhs under the bus for personal political gains.


There is, of course, a history of persecution of the Sikh community by Islamic regimes. In Pakistan and Afghanistan, Sikhs are persecuted by the majority Muslim community, leading many of them to come over to India for a better future. However, it appears that certain Sikh political leaders, are ignoring centuries of history for short term political gains.







Kashmir’s Muslim bodies condemn ‘forced’ interfaith marriage

Peerzada AshiqSRINAGAR, JUNE 28, 2021 19:25 IST

UPDATED: JUNE 28, 2021 19:25 IST

SHARE ARTICLE 0PRINTA A A

Support family of Sikh girl who was married to an elderly Muslim man


Kashmir-based religious bodies on Monday expressed their support to the Sikh community, a day after the community leaders alleged that a girl was forced to marry a Muslim man and converted to Islam.


“Sikh brethren are a part and parcel of Kashmir’s society. There is no place for forcible conversion in Islam and reports of forcible conversion of Sikh girl to other religion on a gun-point can never be considered as a conversion in Islamic jurisprudence,” J&K’s grand mufti Nasir-ul-Islam said.


He urged an impartial inquiry into the matter. “Kashmir is known for maintaining communal harmony for years together and Sikhs are important part of Kashmir’s age-old culture, ethos and communal brotherhood. No one will be allowed to play with the faith of Sikh brethren,” Mr. Islam said.


Teams of the Mutahida Majlis-e-Ulema (MMU), an amalgam of religious leaders and religious bodies, also visited the family of the Sikh girl who was allegedly forced to marry a elderly Muslim man. “We have taken a serious note of the issue. We will ensure that the Sikh community is assured full support of Muslims. Islam does not believe in coercion,” an MMU spokesman said.



Mufti Anayatullah, Imam at the Markazi Jamia Masjid-Jammu, said the allegations of forceful conversion were serious and has no place in Islamic principals. “I have strong reasons to believe that the incident is completely private in nature but certain elements are trying to give it a religious colour. I request the administration to hold an impartial investigation in the matter,” he said.


National Conference's Omar Abdullah and Peoples Democratic Party's Mehbooba Mufti alleged that an attempt was being made to divide the people in J&K.


“The authorities should move quickly to investigate the recent cause of tension and if anyone has broken the law the should be prosecuted and necessary punishment handed out. Any move to drive a wedge between Sikhs and Muslims in Kashmir will cause irreparable harm to J&K,” Mr. Abdullah said.


Ms. Mufti said she hoped the investigation agency will get to the bottom of the issue.


Jagmohan Singh Raina, president of the All Party Sikh Coordination Committee (APSCC), said the community was agitating over the “forcible” marriage of a Sikh girl from Rainawari area of Srinagar.


“This forced marriage was pre-planned and backed by some powerful people. The girl’s parents were not allowed to go inside the court. The girl was forced to sign marriage papers. we want an end to such incidents,” Mr. Raina told The Hindu.


Meanwhile, the police said it has handed over the girl to the family. “We saw two to three such cases in the past one year. People are disturbing the communal harmony. Since ages we have been living together with brotherhood and this age-old bond cannot be broken with such conspiracies. The accused should be arrested as soon as possible and tried in the court of law for abduction and forcible marriage,” he added.



Two Sikh girls abducted and converted to Islam in Kashmir: What we know

Situation is currently tensed in Valley as protests against the abduction and religious conversion of Sikh girls to Islam have intensified.


27 June, 2021

OpIndia Staff


Two Sikh girls converted to Islam in Kashmir (representational image: theguardian.com)

2609


 

Two Sikh girls from Kashmir have been reportedly abducted and converted to Islam. Of these, one girl who was married off to the Muslim boy is still missing.



Details about Sikh girls from Kashmir

On June 26, a case of forced conversion came to light from Jammu & Kashmir. As per reports, an 18-year-old Sikh Girl from Badgam district was lured and forcefully converted to Islam. Shiromani Akali Dal leader Manjinder Singh Sirsa and Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) have also raised the issue on social media platforms urging the Lieutenant Governor of Jammu and Kashmir to intervene.


Another case is of a girl from Mehjoor Nagar in Srinagar who attended function of her Muslim friend. As per Bali, she was married off to a boy who attended the function. While the girl was not a minor, she is still missing.


The case of handing over girl to a Muslim family

According to Sardar Santpal Singh, President Gurudwara Parbandhak Committee-Budgam, who narrated the whole incident, the girl was mentally unstable. A Muslim man lured her on the pretext of love and marriage to convert her. He said, “A girl from Sikh community has been forcefully converted to Islam. She is not mentally stable. The man lured her on the pretext of love. It is not a love affair but a clear case of Love Jihad. The government is acting negatively against us.”




 

He further added that despite written assurance by the SP who was handling the case that she would be handed over back to the Sikh family, the court orders came against them. He said, “The police inspector had assured in writing that the girl would be handed over to them after presenting her in the Court. However, the judge gave the judgement in favour of the Muslim man and handed over the girl to him.”


The family of the girl was not allowed in the Court

Santpal Singh further said that the parents and relatives of the girl were sitting outside the Court as they were not allowed inside due to Covid regulations. He said, “The Police asked the family members of the girl to sit outside to avoid the crowd in the Court. However, all the relatives of the Muslim man were allowed in the Court. The judge recorded the statement of the girl in the absence of her family members and took note of the statements of the relatives of the Muslim man. No one from the family of the girl was called in the Court during the proceedings.”


He further added that the judge should have handed over the girl to the Sikh family at least for a week. If the girl still wanted to go to the Muslim man, no one would have stopped her. “But at least for a week, the girl should have been given to the Sikh family,” he added. Santpal urged the majority community (Muslims) to come in support of them. He reminded them how the Sikh community helped them in bringing girls back from cities like Pune and Mumbai and supported them in their time of need. “Can’t you help us now? Come forward and support us. The brotherhood should remain intact in the Kashmir valley,” he asked.


He urged the government and LG to hand over the girl for at least a week. They will not interfere if the girl decides to go back to the Muslim family after one week. Someone in the background could be heard saying that the Muslim man has already married 2-3 times.


‘What kind of system does not allow girls family to enter the court?’


 

Another Sikh man who was present at the scene said, “What kind of system is functioning in the Court that passes the judgement without hearing the girl’s family? Why was the judgement passed in a day? Why girl’s family was not allowed in the Court?” He urged the central government to intervene. He added that the girl was kidnapped around four days ago. She was recovered by the Police from Chandoosa. “She was kept in remand for two days and presented in the court on Saturday,” he said.


Those aware of the case said that the judge did not even ask about the girl’s parents. “What kind of judge was he who did not even care to inquire about girl’s parents?” A Sikh man asked.


‘Pass a law against Love Jihad like UP’

Another Sikh man present outside the Court said that Jammu and Kashmir needs a law against forceful conversions just like Uttar Pradesh. The girl should not be handed over to the man without the signatures of the girl’s parents. The Sikh community urged the government to initiate an investigation in the case.


The incident attracted criticism from all sections

Akali Dal’s Manjinder Singh Sirsa said, “Urging J&K LG to address this issue of Srinagar. A Sikh girl (mentally disturbed) has been given to the family of a Muslim guy by the Court. The family of the girl wasn’t even allowed to attend the Court’s proceedings while the boy’s whole family was inside the Court.”




 

He further called it a biased action towards the minority. Claiming it was not the first case of conversion in the valley on the pretext of love, he said, “The girl’s family seeks her custody for a week & after that, she can choose to make the decision as she wants. It is important that the girl is given freedom.”


Tejinder Singh Sodhi, Reporter CNN News 18, said, “Sikh community in Kashmir is treated as second class citizens, nothing has changed for the community in the past 70 years. Why not a single person from the majority community is standing with Sikhs right now when the same Sikhs have always stood to protect their daughters.”



Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) also raised the issue. They said, “It is reported #Sikh Sangat is protesting at Srinagar Judicial Complex allegedly for ‘biased’ decision related to a case of ‘forced conversion’ of a Sikh girl who is reported to be mentally unstable.” They urged LG and J&K Police to ensure the safety of Sikhs in J&K.



They further added, “Sikhs in Kashmir alleges that family of a boy given custody of girl by Court, was present inside the Court, while the girl’s family was not taken into confidence. This is a clear case of biased action towards minority #Sikhs, and this is not the first such case,” and urged the authorities to take action. The man who lured the girl is reportedly 60-years-old.


Police promised to hand over the girl to the family

United Sikh Forum, Jammu And Kashmir, posted several videos in which Sikh community members were seen protesting outside the court premises.



In one of the videos, SP was heard saying that they would hand over the girl to the Sikh family. He said that the girl caused a drama in the Court and told the judge that Police was harassing and torturing her.



He further assured the protesting Sikhs that the girl would be soon handed over to the Sikh family and urged the protesters to leave the premises outside the Court.






Monday 21 June 2021

‘Had There Been a Non-Muslim With Us, We Would Not Have Been Arrested’

 ‘Had There Been a Non-Muslim With Us, We Would Not Have Been Arrested’

Also charged with terrorism and sedition, Alam, the taxi driver who took Kerala journalist Siddique Kappan to Hathras last year, is now in legal limbo.


‘Had There Been a Non-Muslim With Us, We Would Not Have Been Arrested’

Alam (centre) and Siddique Kappan (right) in police custody. Photo: PTI/Files


Tarushi Aswani

Tarushi Aswani

Subscription

One-Time

Support Investigative Journalism

₹ 499.00

Frequency: Monthly

Support In-Depth Reporting

₹ 399.00

Frequency: Monthly

Support Daily Reporting

₹ 199.00

Frequency: Monthly


Support The Wire

Powered by 

COMMUNALISMGOVERNMENTLAW

17 HOURS AGO

New Delhi: For the last nine months, Bushra has been cursing herself every day for not stopping her husband Alam from going to work on October 5, 2020.

That day, Alam, a cab driver with the ride-share company Ola, had been on duty in Greater Noida in the early hours of the morning. By 8 am, he had completed two rides. After that, Bushra and the rest of Alam’s family had heard nothing from him or about him for the rest of the day, until a news telecast that night named him as one of four people arrested at Maant, Uttar Pradesh.

“They were telling all kinds of lies on the news. They called him a terrorist, a conspirer and what not,” said Bushra.

Alam, it turned out, had logged out of the Ola system after 8 am to pick up a third ride that would earn him a little more money. The people he had picked up were Siddique Kappan, a journalist from Kerala, and Atiqur Rehman and Masood, two activists of the Campus Front of India, a Muslim students’ organisation. The three men had been headed to Hathras village in Uttar Pradesh where Kappan had planned to report on the case of a Dalit woman who had allegedly been gang-raped and murdered by Thakur caste men.

But Alam’s car had been stopped near the Mathura Toll Plaza by the Uttar Pradesh police and everyone in the vehicle, including Alam, had been arrested and charged under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for breaching public peace and tranquility. Two days later, he and his three passengers had been charged with two offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) as well as several offences under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Information Technology Act (IT Act) and jailed. And ever since then, Alam, Bushra and their family have lived in legal limbo.



‘Law to terrorise’


Every opportunity for Alam’s release since October 5, 2020, has been stymied by yet another chargesheet filed by the UP Police. The case has also been transferred between several police departments, leading to a series of investigative delays.


On October 7 last year, two days after they had been arrested under the CrPC, Alam and his passengers were about to be released by the sub-district magistrate at Maant when the police charged them with offences under the UAPA, IPC and ITA.


The case was then transferred from the Maant police to the crime branch, after which, on October 23, 2020, it was transferred again to the special task force (STF) in Lucknow. Soon after, the STF filed an application to transfer the case to the additional district and sessions judge of Mathura.



Alam. Photo: Special arrangement


On April 3 this year, when 180 days had passed since their incarceration and no evidence had been found against them in that time, the four men were entitled to bail by default. But that very day, the police filed another chargesheet against them before the sessions court. This document charged eight Muslim men, including Alam, Kappan, Rehman and Masood, with the intent to incite caste-based riots between the Dalit and Thakur communities after the gang-rape case in Hathras, with the help of funding from the Popular Front of India (PFI, an Islamist political organisation that has been accused by politicians and police officers of involvement in extremism, even though no government at the Centre or state has so far sought to legally ban it.).


Alam’s advocate, Saifan Sheikh, alleges that the intention of the STF assigned to the case and the UP government is to keep all the accused behind bars to conceal the reality of the situation in Hathras and silence voices that accuse the Yogi Adityanath government of failing to tackle the issue.


“Even the Central Bureau of Investigation confirmed that the victim was raped and murdered and since then there has just been silence on the matter. They [the police] have deliberately added the name of the PFI to the chargesheet to overshadow the rape incident,” said Sheikh.


The chargesheet (SC 600/2021) names four men other than Alam, Kappan, Rehman and Masood in the case. These include Alam’s brother-in-law Danish, who had referred Alam to Rehman on October 5, 2020 when he, Kappan and Masood were looking for a vehicle to take them to Hathras, as well as K.A. Rauf Sherif, the national general secretary of the CFI, and two other CFI activists. The document runs to more 5,000 pages and records the accounts of 54 witnesses, of whom 80% are from the police.


Sheikh claimed that while the prosecution is duty bound to provide a copy of the chargesheet to all the accused and their counsel, none of the accused were provided with the chargesheet in this case. This, he said, is a curtailment of their legal rights and a deliberate measure undertaken to keep them behind bars for as long as possible.


Also read: Article 32: Rights for All or For a Favoured Few?


Currently, all the accused except Danish have been lodged in various Uttar Pradesh jails. Danish might also have been jailed had he not filed a petition stating that the STF had not only named him as an accused but had also called him to appear as a witness in the case.


According to Alam’s counsel Madhuvan Dutt Chaturvedi, while the accused have been charged under the UAPA and with sedition, no evidence suggesting their involvement in any terrorist activity has been found during the investigation.


“The law to prevent terrorism is being used as a law to terrorise people,” Chaturvedi told The Wire. He added that none of accused has committed any activity that threatens the Government of India or the structure of the Constitution of India.


A bail application filed by Alam’s counsel had been rejected on November 13, 2020. On November 7, 2020, the counsel had also filed a habeas corpus writ petition, which is pending for argument and now has been listed for a hearing on July 26. On June 16, the Mathura court dropped three bailable charges against Alam, Kappan, Rehman and Masood. The charges under the CrPC and the IPC were dropped on April 3, when the police failed to complete their probe within the prescribed period of six months. However the UAPA and sedition charges remain.


‘We are not equal’


Since Alam’s arrest, Bushra has been shuttling between her in-laws’ home and her parents’ house, dependent on them and her siblings for financial security. In many ways, she has lost agency over her life.



“Drivery karna kab se gunaah hai? Yaan Muslims ki drivery karna gunaah hai (Since when has driving been a crime? Or is it that driving Muslims is a crime)?” she asked. Formally educated only up to class 8, Bushra has been learning over the last nine months that the very existence of Muslims seems to be a crime.


Aamir, Alam’s brother-in-law, perceives Alam’s arrest as a casualty of the current political and religious climate in Uttar Pradesh. “In this kind of atmosphere, it is very easy to jail anyone,” he said.


He also feels that it is difficult for Muslims to hold institutions accountable for their ills. “Muslims have nowhere to go, no one to fall back on. Even though we are citizens of the country, we are not equal,” he said.


Aamir has had several conversations with Alam over the phone, mostly on the possibility of Alam being freed from jail, he told The Wire. Alam understands the larger scheme of things that frame him for his mere existence as a Muslim, Aamir said. But Alam has also understood something more dangerous.


Aamir quoted Alam as saying: “Sab politics hai, aur isme in policewaale bhi majboor hain (The case is all about politics and even the police are helpless).”


Alam also once suggested to Aamir: “Shayed koi ghair Muslim saath hota toh hum bach jaate (Had there been a non-Muslim with us, we wouldn’t have been arrested).”


Accused of being associated with an organisation that he had never heard of before, only thick chargesheets have taught Alam what PFI stands for.


According to Aamir, Alam’s arrest has changed him. Once a confident, friendly man, Alam has become scared, cynical and distrustful. Having been incarcerated merely for picking up a ride to earn a little extra money, Alam is scared to return to his profession as a driver ever again.


Also read: Muslim Victim’s Family Challenges ‘No Communal Angle’ Claim by UP Police


Alam hails from Rampur in Uttar Pradesh. Earlier a Gramin Seva rickshaw driver, he had bought his car in partnership with another relative in late September, 2020, and had only been driving for Ola for 10 days before he was arrested.


His parents wait desperately for the five-minute phone calls that jails allow their prisoners to make five or six times a week. During those five minutes, they say, they almost glue the phone to their ears to absorb as much of Alam as they can. The tone of his voice, they say, has dulled into deeper and deeper pessimism with every phone call. How long, they wonder, will they survive without seeing their son?


A few days ago, there was some hope. Bushra smiled widely after nine whole months. “The release of Natasha Narwal, Devangana Kalita and Asif Iqbal Tanha has given me hope. Even though my husband has been charged with terrorism, I’m hopeful. All those innocent people who have been caged by the UAPA, I identify with their pain,” she said.


But her smile vanished a day later when the vacation bench of the Supreme Court ruled that the Delhi high court’s order releasing Natasha, Devangana and Asif could not have precedent value.



With loans for legal fees, no money to travel to Mathura to see Alam and the everyday reality of their lived experiences as Muslims in Yogi Adityanath’s UP, Bushra and her in-laws can do little but continue to learn the politics of religion the hard way.


Tarushi Aswani is a freelance journalist based in Delhi. She tweets at @tarushi_aswani.

Tuesday 8 June 2021

Hyderabad 1948: India's hidden massacre

 Hyderabad 1948: India's hidden massacre

By Mike Thomson

Presenter, Document, Radio 4


Published24 September 2013

Share

The Jewel of The Nizams 'Falaknuma Palace' which was the former residence of Nizam Mehaboob Ali Khan in the old city area of Hyderabad

When India was partitioned in 1947, about 500,000 people died in communal rioting, mainly along the borders with Pakistan. But a year later another massacre occurred in central India, which until now has remained clouded in secrecy.


In September and October 1948, soon after independence from the British Empire, tens of thousands of people were brutally slaughtered in central India.


Some were lined up and shot by Indian Army soldiers. Yet a government-commissioned report into what happened was never published and few in India know about the massacre. Critics have accused successive Indian governments of continuing a cover-up.


The massacres took place a year after the violence of partition in what was then Hyderabad state, in the heart of India. It was one of 500 princely states that had enjoyed autonomy under British colonial rule.


When independence came in 1947 nearly all of these states agreed to become part of India.


Old map of India

But Hyderabad's Muslim Nizam, or prince, insisted on remaining independent. This refusal to surrender sovereignty to the new democratic India outraged the country's leaders in New Delhi.



After an acrimonious stand-off between Delhi and Hyderabad, the government finally lost patience.


Historians say their desire to prevent an independent Muslim-led state taking root in the heart of predominantly Hindu India was another worry.


Members of the powerful Razakar militia, the armed wing of Hyderabad's most powerful Muslim political party, were terrorising many Hindu villagers.


This gave the Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, the pretext he needed. In September 1948 the Indian Army invaded Hyderabad.


In what was rather misleadingly known as a "police action", the Nizam's forces were defeated after just a few days without any significant loss of civilian lives. But word then reached Delhi that arson, looting and the mass murder and rape of Muslims had followed the invasion.


Determined to get to the bottom of what was happening, an alarmed Nehru commissioned a small mixed-faith team to go to Hyderabad to investigate.


It was led by a Hindu congressman, Pandit Sunderlal. But the resulting report that bore his name was never published.


Historian Sunil Purushotham from the University of Cambridge has now obtained a copy of the report as part of his research in this field.


A copy of the Sunderlal report

image captionPandit Sunderlal's team concluded that between 27,000 and 40,000 died

The Sunderlal team visited dozens of villages throughout the state.


At each one they carefully chronicled the accounts of Muslims who had survived the appalling violence: "We had absolutely unimpeachable evidence to the effect that there were instances in which men belonging to the Indian Army and also to the local police took part in looting and even other crimes.


"During our tour we gathered, at not a few places, that soldiers encouraged, persuaded and in a few cases even compelled the Hindu mob to loot Muslim shops and houses."


The team reported that while Muslim villagers were disarmed by the Indian Army, Hindus were often left with their weapons. The mob violence that ensued was often led by Hindu paramilitary groups.


In other cases, it said, Indian soldiers themselves took an active hand in the butchery: "At a number of places members of the armed forces brought out Muslim adult males from villages and towns and massacred them in cold blood."


The investigation team also reported, however, that in many other instances the Indian Army had behaved well and protected Muslims.


The Nizam Mahbub Ali Khan and Party Posed with Tiger Skins at Shikar Camp, April–May 1899

image captionThe Nizam of Hyderabad was a powerful prince. In this picture taken in 1899, the Nizam, Mahbub Ali Khan, and his party pose with tiger skins

The backlash was said to have been in response to many years of intimidation and violence against Hindus by the Razakars.


In confidential notes attached to the Sunderlal report, its authors detailed the gruesome nature of the Hindu revenge: "In many places we were shown wells still full of corpses that were rotting. In one such we counted 11 bodies, which included that of a woman with a small child sticking to her breast. "


And it went on: "We saw remnants of corpses lying in ditches. At several places the bodies had been burnt and we would see the charred bones and skulls still lying there."


The Sunderlal report estimated that between 27,000 to 40,000 people lost their lives.


Indian Shiite Muslims take part in religious prayers at 'Ashoorkhana' in the Aza Khana Zehara in Hyderabad, on January 5, 2009. The structure, built by the seventh Nizam Mir Osman Ali Kahan to perpetuate the memory of his mother Amtul Zehra Begum

image captionA Shiite shrine built by the seventh Nizam to perpetuate his mother's memory

No official explanation was given for Nehru's decision not to publish the contents of the Sunderlal report, though it is likely that, in the powder-keg years that followed independence, news of what happened might have sparked more Muslim reprisals against Hindus.


It is also unclear why, all these decades later, there is still no reference to what happened in the nation's schoolbooks. Even today few Indians have any idea what happened.


The Sunderlal report, although unknown to many, is now open for viewing at the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library in New Delhi.


There has been a call recently in the Indian press for it to be made more widely available, so the entire nation can learn what happened.


It could be argued this might risk igniting continuing tensions between Muslims and Hindus.


"Living as we are in this country with all our conflicts and problems, I wouldn't make a big fuss over it," says Burgula Narasingh Rao, a Hindu who lived through those times in Hyderabad and is now in his 80s.


"What happens, reaction and counter-reaction and various things will go on and on, but at the academic level, at the research level, at your broadcasting level, let these things come out. I have no problem with that."


Nizam Mir Osman Ali Khan’s great-granddaughter claims share

DECCAN CHRONICLE. | ATHER MOIN

PublishedNov 8, 2019, 1:56 am ISTUpdatedNov 8, 2019, 2:03 am IST


Granddaughter says Moazzam Jah was deprived of rightful inheritance, mulls legal action.

Princess Shafia Sakina along with her family members addresses a press conference in city on Thursday.

 Princess Shafia Sakina along with her family members addresses a press conference in city on Thursday.

HYDERABAD: Princess Shafiya Sakina, great-granddaughter of last Nizam Mir Osman Ali Khan, has urged Govern-ment of India to provide her and her sister their legitimate share in properties of the last Nizam.


She is the daughter of princess Fatima Fauzia who is the daughter of Prince Moazzam Jah Bahadur, the younger son of the Nizam VII, Mir Osman Ali Khan.



 

 


Addressing the media, the titular princess said she was contemplating filing a partition suit seeking her legitimate share in all the properties mentioned in the blue book. She urged the Centre represented by the Union finance secretary, who is ex-officio chairman of the H.E.H.


The Nizam’s Trust and other related trusts, to take action to protect her rights on the $335 million fund, which belonged to the late Nizam in NatWest Bank London.


Princess Shafiya challenged the action of the last Nizam assigning the London Fund to President of India during pendency of the case and the action of princes Mukarram Jah Bahadur (Mir Barkat Ali Khan) and Muffakham Jah Bahadur (Mir Karamat Ali Khan), grandsons of Mir Osman Ali Khan claiming 50:50 share of Hillview and Shannon respectively. She maintained that this action is illegal and void under rule lis pendens (pending suit).



 

 


The Nizam’s great granddaughter claimed that the princes who are the sons of Prince Azam Jah, the eldest son of the last Nizam, had misled the Royal Court of London by concealing the name of Prince Moazzam Jah, the second son of Mir Osman Ali Khan and the father of princess Fatima.


They also concealed the names of other named beneficiaries.


The princess said she as the eldest daughter of princess Fatima Fauzia, who was the eldest daughter of Prince Moazzam Jah, had rights on the amount.


She pointed out that under Nizam Trust Deeds (Validation) Act 1950, 28 Trust Deeds have been validated and they have the force of law. Under them, only the named beneficiaries in the deeds would get income though the corpus funds belonging to the issues of the named beneficiaries. She said earlier, Nizam’s jewellery was acquired by the Govern-ment of India for Rs 218 crore.



 

 


In this, the shares of her grandfather Prince Moazzam Jah, Princess Ahmedunnisa Begum, aka Shahzadi Pasha, the daughter of last Nizam, and Prince Basalath Jah (half share holder), the step brother of last Nizam, were cumulatively Rs 95 crore.


Princess Shafiya explai-ned that after the death of Shahzadi Pasha in 1985, her share had gone to her only blood brother Moaz-zam Jah, who was alive at that time, while Azam Jah Bahadur, another blood brother, had expired in 1970. Basalath Jah was issueless. Thus, the Rs 95 crore corpus fund should have been divided among all his issues including her. Instead, Mukarram Jah, Prince Moazzam Jah, Mufakkham Jah, Princess Esra (divorced wife of Mukarram Jah), Asif Pasha and various other beneficiaries, who are not issues of Moazzam Jah, distributed the fund among themselves by compromise deed done on 25th June 2002 and she had been deprived of her genuine share. She claimed that she was also deprived of her share in two Grand Daughter’s Wedding Gift Trust Deed done on September 4, 1951, when she was minor. 


She alleged that though other legal heirs of Mir Osman Ali Khan were getting their share from the properties of her great grandfather and funds deposited under various trusts, she has not got a single penny. Being one of the shareholders of all the palaces of her great grandfather and grandfather Moazzam Jah Bahadur, the second son of Mir Osman Ali Khan, she should reside in the palace. But Prince Mukarram Jah Bahadur, Prince Muffakham Jah Bahadur, Princess Esra, Asif Pasha and other trustees deprived her also of her housing rights, the Princess stated, seeking the intervention of the Government of India.


Media5zone

tSrlMays apo1h0n,mr n2slc0doSre17di  · 

*BIG BREAKING NEWS*

*THE SULTAN UL ULOOM EDUCATION SOCIETY IS IN ILLEGAL OCCUPATION OF THE ‘MOUNT PLEASANT’ A FIR IS REGISTERED AGAINST THE TRUSTEES OF MJ TRUST AND THE SOCIETY*

*Panjagutta PS* registered a FIR 357/2017 against trustees of Muazzam Jah trust and trustees of Sultan-ul-uloom Education society i.e. Asif Pasha S/o Abdul Hannan, and Zafar Javed S/o Amjad Ali Khan and others.on the complaint of Ameena Marzia one of the  daughters   of Late Waleshan Prince Muazzam  Jah Bahadur,  and  grand doughter of H.E.H.  the Nizam VII Nawab Mir Sir Osman Ali Khan Bahadur. 

It is said by Ameena Marzia that The Sultan-ul-uloom Education society (SUES) is in illegal occupation of the Mount Pleasant 8-2-249 to 267, Road No.3, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad and running educational institutions under the names of : Muffakham Jah College of Engineering , Sulthan-Ul-Uloom Collage of Pharmacy, Amjad Ali khan College of Business administration etc at the said premises with ownership and title.

The Ameena Marzia declared that the ‘Mount pleasant’ palace along with land admeasuring Ac.24-10 gts, in Survey No. 359, Shaikpet village Road No.3, Banjara Hills is the property of ‘Muzam Jah trust’, The H.E.H.  the Nizam VII Nawab Mir Sir Osman Ali Khan Bahadur created theTrust for the benefit of his son Waleshah Prince Muazam Jah on 8-10-1949 called as “ Prince Muazzam Jah Trust” which Trust was validated under the Validation Act  No. XXIV 1950 along with other Trusts.

The ‘Mount pleasant’ palace along with land admeasuring Ac.24-10 gts, in Survey No. 359, Shaikpet village Road No.3, Banjara Hills was purchased by the trust for the residence of the Prince Muazzam  Jah Bahadur and according to the trust deed it is mandatory on the part of the trustees to divide and transfer the property amongst and to all the issues of the said Prince after the demise of the said prince in accordance with the provisions of the law of succession governing Sunni Muslims.

The Trustees i.e. i.e. Asif Pasha S/o Abdul Hannan and others acted in clear violation and the directions contained in the Trust Deed, the Trustees have colluded with the Sultan-ul-uloom Education Society (SUES) and its trustees Zafar Javed S/o Amjad Ali Khan and others inducted the Society into possession initially as a tenant only for the Building and appurtenant land of 1000 sq. mtrs. and thereafter, as Agreement Holder in utter disregard of the very intent of the Trust, in gross violation of their responsibilities with malafide criminal intentions in clear violation of their authority vested in them having entered into criminal conspiracy of cheating, thereby caused wrongful loss to the complainant and had wrongful gain for themselves.  

The complainant Ameena Marzia said that, there is ample evidence to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.  

It is pertinent to mention here that The society falsely misrepresented the AICTE also, posing themselves as the owner of the said property and obtained the affiliation which itself is a criminal act, the vigilance of the AICTE also investigated the matter, a two-man justice committee was appointed by AICTE vigilance cell and asked the society to submit the ownership / land title documents of the land in favor of the society but the society failed to submit the same, the society also failed to submit the copies of the approved building plan by the competent authority and completion certificate to the committee. Now It is likely that AICTE will also cancel its approval to the society soon.

*MEDIA5ZONE CRIME CHIEF*